Temporal Summation in Chronic Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to characterize central sensitization further among women with chronic pelvic pain by identifying temporal summation using a cotton-tipped applicator test that can be used at the bedside. METHOD: A total of 36 women (18 with chronic pain and allodynia; 18 without pain) were recruited. Both groups were randomly assigned to receive 3 strokes of a benign stimulus on the abdomen at differing frequencies: 10, 30, or 100 seconds. Each group included 6 women. Pain was assessed using a rating scale of 1 to 10. Data were analyzed using the multivariate approach to repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: The pattern of pain scores differed significantly between women with and without chronic pain (P = 0.002). Women with chronic pelvic pain and allodynia showed a statistically significant increase in pain with successive strokes of the cotton-tipped applicator (P = 0.012 for stroke 1 vs. 2, P = 0.026 for stroke 2 vs. 3, and P = 0.005 for stroke 1 vs. 3). CONCLUSION: Women with chronic pelvic pain and allodynia showed significant worsening of pain with successive strokes of a cotton-tipped applicator. This finding indicates that pain wind-up and central sensitization are present in women with chronic pelvic pain and allodynia. Identification of summation is further evidence of neuroplasticity, which is helpful in innovative therapies for chronic pelvic pain.

No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

No 164 - Directive clinique de consensus pour la prise en charge de la douleur pelvienne chronique.

OBJECTIF: Améliorer La compréhension de la douleur pelvienne chronique (DPC) et fournir des directives cliniques factuelles qui bénéficieront aux fournisseurs de soins de santé primaires, aux obstétriciens-gynécologues et aux spécialistes de la douleur chronique. FARDEAU DE LA SOUFFRANCE: La DPC est une pathologie débilitante courante qui affecte les femmes. Elle est à l'origine d'importantes souffrances personnelles et de dépenses de santé considérables associées aux interventions, dont de multiples consultations et un grand nombre de traitements médicaux et chirurgicaux. Puisque la pathophysiologie sous-jacente de cet état pathologique complexe est mal comprise, ces traitements n'ont obtenu que des taux de réussite variables. ISSUES: Efficacité des options diagnostiques et thérapeutiques (y compris l'évaluation du dysfonctionnement myofascial); soins multidisciplinaires; un modèle de réadaptation mettant l'accent sur l'obtention d'un fonctionnement supérieur malgré la présence d'une certaine douleur (plutôt que de chercher à obtenir une guérison totale); et utilisation appropriée des opiacés pour le soulagement de la douleur chronique. PREUVES: Des recherches ont été menées dans Medline et la base de données Cochrane en vue d'en tirer les articles de langue anglaise, publiés entre 1982 et 2004, portant sur des sujets liés à la DPC, dont la gestion des soins actifs, le dysfonctionnement myofascial et les options thérapeutiques médicales et chirurgicales. Les membres du comité ont analysé la littérature pertinente, ainsi que les données disponibles tirées d'une évaluation des besoins des personnes présentant une DPC; ils ont fait appel à une approche de consensus pour l'élaboration des recommandations. VALEURS: La qualité des résultats a été évaluée au moyen des critères décrits dans le rapport du Groupe d'étude canadien sur l'examen médical périodique. Les recommandations visant la pratique ont été classées conformément à la méthode décrite dans ce rapport (Tableau 1). RECOMMANDATIONS: Les recommandations visent ce qui suit : (a) compréhension des besoins des femmes présentant une DPC ; (b) évaluation clinique générale ; (c) évaluation pratique des niveaux de douleur ; (d) douleur myofasciale ; (e) médicaments et interventions chirurgicales ; (f) principes de la gestion des opiacés; (g) utilisation accrue de l'imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM) ; (h) documentation de l'étendue de La maladie constatée au moyen de la chirurgie ; (i) thérapies non conventionnelles; (j) accès à des modèles de soins multidisciplinaires faisant appel à des composantes de physiothérapie (comme l'exercice et la posture) et de psychologie (comme La thérapie cognitivo- comportementale), conjointement avec d'autres disciplines médicales, telles que La gynécologie et l'anesthésie ; (k) attention accrue portée à La DPC dans La formation des professionnels de La sante ; et (l) attention accrue portée à la DPC dans le domaine des recherches officielles et de haut calibre. Le comité recommande que les ministères provinciaux de La Sante prennent des mesures en faveur de la création d'équipes multidisciplinaires pouvant assurer La prise en charge de cette pathologie. Chapitre 2 : Portee et definition de La douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 3 : Anamnese, examen physique et évaluation psychologique Chapitre 4 : Explorations Chapitre 5 : Sources de douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 6 : Causes urologiques et gastro-intestinales de La douleur pelvienne chronique Chapitre 7 : Dysfonctionnement myofasclal Chapitre 8 : Therapie medicale - résultats en matiere d'efficacite Chapitre 9 : Chirurgie - résultats en matiere d'efficacite Chapitre 11 : Prise en charge multidisciplinaire de La douleur chronique Chapitre 14 : Orientations futures.

Protocol for a placebo-controlled, within-participants crossover trial evaluating the efficacy of intranasal oxytocin to improve pain and function among women with chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain.

INTRODUCTION: This protocol presents the rationale and design for a trial evaluating the efficacy of intranasal oxytocin in improving pain and function among women with chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain. Oxytocin is a neuropeptide traditionally recognised for involvement in labour, delivery and lactation. Novel evidence suggests that oxytocin decreases pain sensitivity in humans. While oxytocin administration has been reported to lower pain sensitivity among patients experiencing chronic back pain, headache, constipation and colon pain, no research has evaluated the association between intranasal oxytocin and chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain. The association between oxytocin and pain may differ in women with chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain relative to other chronic pain conditions because of the abundance of oxytocin receptors in the uterus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-participants crossover trial. 50 women with chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain will be recruited through a local chronic pain centre and gynaecology clinics. Women will complete baseline measures and be randomised to an experimental or control condition that involve 2 weeks of self-administering twice-daily doses of 24 IU intranasal oxytocin or placebo, respectively. Women will then undergo a 2-week washout period before crossing over to receive the condition that they had not yet received. The primary outcome will be pain and function measured using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Secondary outcomes include emotional function, sleep disturbance and global impression of change. This trial will provide data on the 14-day safety and side-effect profile of intranasal oxytocin self-administered as an adjuvant treatment for chronic pelvic musculoskeletal pain. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was granted approval from Health Canada and the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, and is registered online at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT02888574). Results will be disseminated to healthcare professionals through peer-reviewed publications and to the general public through press releases. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02888574; Pre-results.

A flexible format interdisciplinary treatment and rehabilitation program for chronic daily headache: patient clinical features, resource utilization and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographics, diagnoses, program duration, human resource utilization and outcomes of patients with chronic daily headache treated in an ambulatory, interdisciplinary, flexible format, treatment and rehabilitation program. BACKGROUND: Research indicates that multidisciplinary care is an effective approach to manage chronic daily headache, but little is known about the resources needed for effective care. METHODS: The study was a secondary data analysis within a cohort design of previously collected data. Patients completed questionnaires and outcome measures on admission and discharge. Diagnoses were extracted from patient charts by professional health records personnel. A central scheduling database provided patient-specific clinician care hours by discipline and type (direct, indirect, group) as well as overall program duration. RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients were studied (mean age 41.1 ± 10.4 [x ± SD], 80% female). Sixty-two patients (52.5%) completed the program ("completers"). Migraine was the most common diagnosis. Thirty-six percent of patients had medication overuse. Average pain, mood, disability, and quality of life were significantly improved in completers (P < .001). They utilized 76 ± 45.1 (x ± SD ) total hours of care delivered over a mean of 129.7 ± 66.1 weeks. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that ambulatory, interdisciplinary, flexible format, treatment and rehabilitation programs are effective in the treatment of chronic daily headache, and we provide data on the resources used by our program in the treatment and rehabilitation of these patients.

Maternal lead exposure and the secondary sex ratio.

BACKGROUND: A reduction in the secondary sex ratio may be associated with exposure to environmental toxicants. Little data exists relating this outcome to lead exposure, a well-known reproductive toxicant. METHODS: We studied 1980 women having singleton births from 1994 to 1995 and from 1997 to 2001 who participated in a cohort study of lead exposure and infant outcomes in Mexico City. Levels of lead were measured in maternal and cord blood using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy, and levels of lead in maternal patella and tibia bone (a reflection of cumulative exposure) were measured using noninvasive K-X-ray fluorescence measurements. Using logistic regression models, we evaluated the relations of these measures to secondary sex ratio in the offspring, adjusting for maternal age, parity and year of infants' birth. RESULTS: We found no consistent association between any of the lead measures and secondary sex ratio. Results were unchanged when we adjusted for infants' year of birth, maternal age and parity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a large sample size and the use of sensitive biomarkers, we did not find evidence that maternal and fetal lead exposure is associated with a lower secondary sex ratio among newborns.

Consensus guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; (j) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

Consensus guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. BURDEN OF SUFFERING: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. OUTCOMES: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. EVIDENCE: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. VALUES: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (f) principles of opiate management; (g) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (h) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (i) alternative therapies; (j) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical isciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; (k) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (l) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition. CHAPTER 7: MYOFASCIAL DYSFUNCTION: 1. Health care providers should become more aware of myofascial dysfunction as a cause of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and the available treatment options (IB). 2. Patients should participate in the management of CPP due to myofascial dysfunction by actively using a home stretching and exercise program (ll-2B). CHAPTER 8: MEDICAL THERAPY--EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS: 1. Opioid therapy can be considered for pain control under adequate supervision (II-3B). 2. Hormonal treatment of chronic pelvic pain of gynaecologic origin, including oral contraceptives, progestins, danazol, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, has been studied extensively and should be considered as the first line for many women, especially those with endometriosis (I and II-1A). 3. Adjuvant medications, such as antidepressants and antibiotics, can be of supporting help in specific situations (II-3B). CHAPTER 9: SURGERY-EVIDENCE ON EFFECTIVENESS: 1. The lack of robust clinical trials of the surgical management of chronic pelvic pain should be addressed. The use of alternative epidemiologic models, including case-controlled and cohort-controlled trials, should be considered (III-A). 2. Further delineation of the role of appendectomy and of presacral neurectomy appears warranted in the management of endometriosis-related pain (III-A). CHAPTER 11: MULTIDISCIPLINARY CHRONIC PAIN MANAGEMENT: 1. Multidisciplinary chronic pain management should be available for women with chronic pelvic pain within the publicly funded health care system in each province and territory of Canada (III-B). CHAPTER 14: FUTURE DIRECTIONS: 1. The curriculum for professional development should be expanded to include theory and techniques in the management of myofascial dysfunction (A). 2. Research into CPP should be encouraged, particularly in the areas of the impact of CPP on the use of health services, the pathophysiology of myofascial dysfunction, and gene therapy. Because randomized trials for qualitative outcomes are exceedingly difficult, alternative robust models, such as case-controlled or cohort-controlled trials, should be pursued (A). 3. Methods of improving interaction with patients should be explored. They might include formal contractual approaches to managing pain with opiates and efforts to better appreciate the patient's perceived needs (A).

Economic evaluation in obstetrics and gynaecology: principles and practice.

Greater attention in health care over the last 2 decades has been placed on determining how best to spend the resources available. Economic evaluation is a commonly used tool to compare health-care services and treatments on the basis of costs and benefits. However, the principles on which economic evaluations are based are not well understood, and guidelines for conducting such evaluations in practice are often not followed. This paper describes the overarching principle of opportunity cost, and highlights the implication that decision-making in health care should necessarily be based on both costs and benefits. Two notions of efficiency, technical and allocative, are also presented, and the important point is made that the specific type of economic evaluation chosen must be based not on the unit of benefit in the given study, as is commonly done, but rather on the type of efficiency being addressed. The 3 primary types of economic evaluation are outlined, and a common pitfall in economic evaluation, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, is critiqued. Finally, a number of methodological considerations when conducting economic evaluations in practice are presented.